From: bad cattitude from @boriquagato <boriquagato@substack.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 at 14:31
Subject: covid vaccines and immune suppression in babies: fertile ground for inquiry
To: <alexey.raskatov@gmail.com>
you like to pretend that you don't like bad cats, but deep down, you know you do… prolonged exposure likely to give you toxoplasmosis. covid vaccines and immune suppression in babies: fertile ground for inquiryanother black swan playing canary in a coal mine?
there have been so many "black swans" lately that one might be forgiven for wondering if the white ones have gone extinct.
and here come some more this time from australia which, in a pleasing metaphoric symmetry, is from whece actual black swans hail. bad cattitude is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. alas, this one looks to be a much, much nastier breed. something appears badly, badly wrong HERE
a full 5% of babies that get both covid and flu are landing in the ICU. that's a terrifying number. and it's exploding into severe pathologies in the sort of babies in which one would not expect to see it:
over-isolated babies with lower immune function is possible, even plausible, but seeing them get colonized by multiple viruses at once in a manner unlike any i've seen before seems more consistent with immune suppression, not failure to develop especially as this isolation issue is neither new nor localized, but this outcome is. more or less no one got flu and covid at the same time. covid was a massive viral outcompete. and suddenly, these babies are getting 2 and 3 viruses at once? trying to blame this on "lockdown" is a deeply unsatisfying explanation. if this were so, why did it not happen a year ago? hmm, what was going on right around when these babies were conceived or in their first trimesters that no other babies before had experienced? to be affecting babies born in q1-2 of 2022, we're looking at the span from q2 last year to now with special focus on q3. (this is full vaxx, first dose trended about 6 weeks earlier so we are right over the target here for current births to 6 mo olds) this was pushed hard on pregnant women. and it was not really tested beforehand.
let's be very clear: this is a hypothesis and correlation does NOT prove causality. (it's also possible this data is exaggerated) but, you'd be unwise to simply ignore a correlation like this, especially when we already know that covid vaccines were showing strong affinity for eggs, sperm, and having fertility effects.  bad cattitudeone of the great early misapprehensions about mRNA vaccines is that they would not have widespread, systematic effects, instead remaining relatively localized. this was rapidly debunked and early st… Read more11 days ago · 604 likes · 306 comments · el gato malo we're not randomly mining for association here, we have an a priori reason to suspect outcomes and the claims that "these vaccines are safe for pregnant women" have proven dangerously unfounded. we've seen high levels of miscarriage that, like so many things that turned out to happen here, were called "impossible." we're also seeing a deeply unsettling drop in global birth rates that is hitting hard in Q1 2022, right where one would expect it if it were vaccine fertility suppression driven. these two issue arising together are suggestive of linkage. and if vaccines can affect sperm and eggs and birth rates, they can affect babies too. the data is still circumstantial and somewhat patchwork, but it's also stark. lockdowns did not do this and neither did past covid.  Jikkyleaks (Fan account) 🐭 @Jikkyleaks June 26th 2022 5,844 Retweets11,326 Likes
(SOURCE)  Birth Gauge @BirthGauge June 4th 2022 119 Retweets315 Likes Igor Chudov 🐭 @ichudov Depopulation of TaiwanBirth Rate Dropped by 23% in ONE YEAR -- And it is NOT Covidigorchudov.substack.comJune 27th 2022 23 Retweets96 Likesthis is a double digit sigma event in many places. that's basically supposed to be all but impossible even once. to happen a dozen times is like rolling yahtzee 1,000 times in a row. it means there is a widespread external driver, we're just trying to ascertain what it is. we know these jabs are immuno-suppressive and are causing all manner of issues in the vaxxed along these lines and around immune fixation. could these same effects pass from mother to child and be driving the "pandemic baby" phenomenon? it seems very possible. i certainly would not call it proven, but there is quite a lot of provocative data coming from both directions: biology and statistical societal experience. Q2 data should show us a great deal more. (we likely also need to be highly selective by vaccine type as we look at this as i know this is an issue for mRNA, but am not sure on the adenovirus vaxxes like AZ or JnJ and doubt it's an issue in any using actual virus.) a worrying aspect of this is that these sorts of disease issues tend to appear in the southern hemisphere first. it's currently winter there and their variants and viral evolution tend to lead and spread to the north next season. (this gets used in flu vaxx design) they are a sort of canary in the respiratory coal mine. and this bird is not looking healthy.
maybe it's idiosyncratic or misreported, but let's face it, black swans are multiplying like rabbits. and that means something bunny is going on here.
i would not go so far as to say that we know for sure what it is, but this issue warrants serious inquiry and NOW. the fact that this is not an all hands on deck emergency at every global health agency would have shocked me to the bone 3 years ago. now it just seems par for the course. that is not a good normal to which to acculturate. this is the sort of work that should have been done LONG before going wide with a vaccine (and always would have in the past). this is triple true of one with such a novel method of action. the fact that this is even a question is a nasty indictment of this whole drug approval and marketing process. (and for lockdowns) the beatings will continue until you get politics out of science. had enough yet? bad cattitude is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
You're a free subscriber to bad cattitude. For extra cat memes and even more snark, become a paying subscriber. © 2022 el gato malo
|
84558731
aldapooh