Sunday, April 30, 2023
Monday, April 24, 2023
Fwd: Miscarriages and Dead Infants Were Described in a Secret FDA Review, but Hidden from The Public
Miscarriages and Dead Infants Were Described in a Secret FDA Review, but Hidden from The PublicPfizer Tried to Hide Its Report for 75 Years
A new document was released to ICAN this April, thanks to a FOIA legal action that compelled the government to provide Pfizer documents they tried to keep secret for 75 years. Indeed, they had a good reason to hide it. That document is called "PREGNANCY AND LACTATION CUMULATIVE REVIEW." Many findings in it validate several concerns of COVID vaccine skeptics. Pfizer identified 458 pregnancies where mothers were vaccinated.
What happened to those pregnancies? The Vaccine Does Cross the PlacentaWe were told that the vaccine "stays in the arm." Was that true? On Page 3, Pfizer describes two cases (out of 458) of unborn babies affected by transplacental transfer of mRNA Covid vaccine. Pfizer's own words:
So, instead of staying in the arm, by Pfizer's admission, the vaccine traveled through the mother's body, penetrated the placenta, and adversely impacted the unborn fetuses. One infant in the above report died of "severe respiratory distress." (AER 2021191405) Another infant, born at 24 weeks of gestation, was not followed up because Pfizer did not care enough to discover what happened. However, 24 weeks gestation (5 months since conception) is a very premature birth. About half of the infants born at 24 weeks die, and of the remaining ones, 40% end up with health issues. I pray that that specific infant survived and is doing well; however, we cannot know, and Pfizer chose not to disclose what happened. The "health experts" who guided pregnant women through the pandemic claimed that the vaccine does not cross the placenta:
High Rate of MiscarriagesOf the 458 pregnancies, 52 ended with pregnancy losses: miscarriage (pregnancy loss under 20 weeks) or spontaneous abortion (pregnancy loss past 20 weeks). That is an 11.3% rate of pregnancy loss. This did not count the premature infants who died shortly after birth. For example, the above-described premature baby AER 2021191405, died in severe respiratory distress after an emergency C-section following the mother's COVID vaccination. Is 11.3% of pregnancies lost normal, or is it abnormally high? Arkmedic explained that answering this question is difficult because the chances of pregnancy loss depend on the week of gestation and are highest in the early weeks. Once pregnant women pass those early weeks, the chance of a loss drops dramatically. For example, the women who get vaccinated at 23 weeks, like the mom of AER 2021191405, already did not have an early miscarriage, and their chances of pregnancy loss would be low by that moment. As women of all gestational ages were vaccinated in Pfizer's population of 458 pregnancies, the expected rate of pregnancy losses (from the moment of vaccination) should be much lower than if the losses were counted from the moment of conception. If we ask, "What would be a normal pregnancy loss rate of those 458 women if they were injected with a placebo instead of the Covid vaccine," the precise estimate would be near impossible. However, it is less than 11.3%. Read Arkmedic's article if you want to know the details. We also know that the Moderna vaccine (higher dose) increases the chances of pregnancy loss by 42% compared to Pfizer, suggesting a dose-response relationship.  Igor's Newsletter[I am in a hospital ER right now with a broken foot. Please forgive me if this post is more incoherent than usual. The wait is taking a while, so I decided to try to finish my post about this] Summary This article will show that CDC's own statistics prove beyond statistical doubt that the higher dose Moderna vaccine causes 42% MORE miscarriages, compared … 6 months ago · 406 likes · 320 comments · Igor Chudov The picture below, a blast from the past from two years ago, proved that the concerns of the person demonstrating were prescient:
Pfizer Report Omits Dead InfantThe Pfizer report, listing adverse events to breastfed infants on page 6, does not mention any dead infants who died while breastfeeding. However, the previous Prizer postmarketing report does mention one breastfeeding infant who died soon after his or her mother was vaccinated. I wrote about that infant a year ago. Igor's NewsletterHat tip to Claus L who reminded me that new Pfizer documents were released. Summary: Only two births were recorded, one was successful and another resulted in infant death. Breastfeeding indeed affects infants and proves mRNA vaccine shedding by breastfeeding mothers… a year ago · 323 likes · 218 comments · Igor Chudov Not sure why Pfizer "disappeared" the dead infant. Maybe they forgot? We can only guess. In a way, the mothers who received the Pfizer vaccine are the lucky ones. The women who received Moderna were 42% more likely to suffer a miscarriage and 93% more likely to have their infant die after birth. What do you think?
© 2023 Igor Chudov
|
Sunday, April 23, 2023
Saturday, April 15, 2023
Tuesday, April 11, 2023
Monday, March 27, 2023
Wednesday, February 22, 2023
сирены - буддизм тут
А ты по барам в пьяном угаре
Что же ты, парень, снова вспоминаешь о том
Как мы гуляли по тротуарам
Мокрым и старым, утром под дождём босиком
По барам, я твоя кара, я твоя карма
Ты найдёшь в толпе мой типаж
Ты подкатил, и она запала
Но это вновь не я, а мираж
"
(с) ANNA ASTI
сценарий
ты и я
из наших окон не видно центра!
Thursday, February 16, 2023
Monday, February 13, 2023
Monday, February 06, 2023
настроение последних недель
Tuesday, January 24, 2023
Wednesday, January 11, 2023
Monday, December 26, 2022
Sunday, December 25, 2022
Saturday, December 17, 2022
Fwd: israeli government "lost the agreement" with pfizer for covid vaccines
you like to pretend that you don't like bad cats, but deep down, you know you do… prolonged exposure likely to give you toxoplasmosis. israeli government "lost the agreement" with pfizer for covid vaccinesthe pandemic of lost data and lost contracts is truly going global
so, apparently, the great risk of working from home is the VAST seeming increase in "the dog eating your homework."
but this is really something. israel, who everyone around the world was looking to for covid data and covid practice, has seemed to have been asleep at every switch. they were not collecting the safety data people thought they were. much of the "official" data they produced looked oddly tainted, slanted, and spun. and now they cannot even seen to find the contracts under which they operated. what an odd outcome. how terribly, terribly curious.
you can see more detail in this tweet from the israeli public broadcaster. (watch video here for those who speak hebrew)
this is really quite a document to be unable to produce. it certainly makes one wonder just what was in it that it could be handled so carelessly… it does look like it turned up though, not that we're likely to ever get to see it. we may get some hint on content from an exploration of another little known pfizer contract signed by the israeli government "The Real World Epidemiological Evidence Collaboration Agreement. (this may also help us to understand the focus and slant of "israeli" studies.)
but here is the real lulu:
maybe read that twice. i mean: woof. even by covid's admittedly low standards, this was appalling. and it kept getting worse.
that's pretty interesting, no? the company does it and the isreali government puts its name on as author? seems a little iffy both legally and ethically. and who can even guess what was in this? (spoiler alert, probably the good stuff)
and this is going to be a FAR from isolated event. pfizer did this everywhere, signed wild deals with draconian non-disclosure, and quite possibly payed some good sized bribes. australian investigations are ongoing.
and it would certainly not be the first time:
bribery and malfeasance have long been a part of pfizer culture. you do not become the most fined corporation in human history by coloring inside the lines… bourla (perhaps wisely) has been refusing to go anywhere near the EU/EP hearings on vaccine contracts.  Carlo Martuscelli @carlomartu Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla pulled out of testifying in front of the European Parliament's COVID panel after new details emerged earlier in the month on how the European Commission negotiated its largest vaccine contracts with the company. 8:24 AM ∙ Sep 30, 2022 80Likes62Retweets guess it's better than making an another "canine consumption" argument… (how a dog can eat a text is question i struggle to answer; but you know dogs…)
but it really is quite a wonder in this day and age how much "evidence" is going missing. these contracts are the wedge that will break this open and there sure are a lot of threads hanging out here that will be interesting to see pulled. the way this was contracted, sold, and mandated has been so crooked it could walk through a corkscrew without bending. and it's starting to leak out from under the rug. and that means that this is where this gets fun. i continue to believe that the low energy path for politicians as this keeps going and and as skeletons keep leaking out of closets like they were necropolises is going to be "discovering" pfraud and throwing pfizer et al under the bus. so many interesting questions yet to be asked in earnest…
bad cattitude is a reader-supported publication. to join the baddest cats in the basket, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. For extra cat memes and even more snark, become a paying subscriber.
Read bad cattitude in the app Listen to posts, join subscriber chats, and never miss an update from el gato malo. © 2022 el gato malo
|
84558731
aldapooh